Powered By Blogger

2011年10月10日月曜日

Types of Pregnancy Loss

Chemical Pregnancy



If you have begun to miscarry, and hadn’t yet been able to hear your baby’s heartbeat with a doppler, your doctor might have said that you are having a chemical pregnancy.

This means that it’s a very early miscarriage.


This very early miscarriage–or the name of it–doesn’t make your baby any less real.  At 5 weeks gestation, just about the time you may have found out that you were pregnant, your baby was about the size of a sesame seed.  And, at 5 weeks gestation, your tiny baby’s heart has already begun to beat.  It’s just too small to be heard on a Doppler.


While identifying your baby at this stage is probably just not going to happen, because of everything that is delivered during the miscarriage, including uterine lining and lots of blood, your baby is real.  Your feelings about your baby are real.


Ectopic Pregnancy



An ectopic pregnancy means that your baby has attached itself to an area outside of the uterus rather than inside your actual uterus.  This situation can be fatal to the mother unless the pregnancy ends as quickly as possible.


This can be a very heartwrenching situation for a mother, who may mistakenly believe that she needs to have an “elective abortion”.  In an elective abortion, a mother electively chooses to terminate her pregnancy-despite the knowledge that the baby most probably would go on to develop through a full term pregnancy, and have a live birth.  In an ectopic pregnancy, the very high probability of the both the baby dying and the mother dying, make delivering the baby as quickly as possible a necessity.

 

2011年6月27日月曜日

© The Self-relaxation Practice with Shikyu-chan


A touch sensitivity or tactition it is the first among fife life sensations what an embryo of 12 weeks old obtains in the development progress. That meant each of us had the very first experience to communicate with the world by touching the inner uterus wall. Then we had the first response from the world by being touched back. Feeling the uterus wall discovers for us that there is exists the World and we realized that stay here not alone.


Physiology of touch-relaxation effect (see more)
When somebody touches us, there's pressure pushing on the skin at the point of contact. And just under the skin are pressure receptors called "Pacinian corpuscles. They receive pressure stimulation, and the pressure receptors send a signal to the brain. A touch activates the brain’s orbitofrontal cortex, which is linked to feelings of reward and compassion. Touch signals safety and trust, it soothes. Basic warm touch calms cardiovascular stress. It activates the body’s vagus nerve (n. vagus), one of the 12 cranial nerves in the brain, which in turn slows the heart and decreases the production of stress hormones including cortisol (hydrocortisone). The same time it triggers release of oxytocin, AKA “the love hormone” or "cuddle hormone", what makes feel more trusting and connected.(Dr. Dacher Keltner, Dr. Matt Hertenstein and Dr.Tiffany Field).

Why to hold something is good for relaxation?
When we touch something it also “touches” us. Our body is balancing a temperature with something or someone during holding or hugging it. Then the phenomenal effect arises: our spatial sensation change and our inner space increase. Now “we” are bigger on the size of the subject or object that we interact with. The walls of our private box move aside and we are getting opener to the Universe.
A benefit of this practice is an ability to be less vulnerable, more adoptable and accept easier any hard situations what we face each day. The touch relaxation practice turns us from a “hard nut” what can be crushed down by any powerful blow, to a “soft ball”, what just reflect it and back to previous condition very next time. 
We recommend the Self-relaxation Practice with Shikyu-chan © for any people under any life circumstances.
If you are a hard-working man or business-woman, busy housewife and mother, to-mush-learning student and stay by yourself grandparent; you are far away from your close person and relative, you feel lonely – © The Self-relaxation Practice with Shikyu-chan is match to you.

© The Self-relaxation Practice with Shikyu-chan and pregnancy
If you are pregnant, pick Shikyu-chan yourself or ask you doctor or midwife how to practice with.
     Obstetricians, midwifes and nurses may suggest
© The Self-relaxation Practice with 
      Shikyu-chan  for:
1.    pregnant women, it helps them to develop connection to their baby. To activate a touch sensation helps to raise a positive feeling for baby’s movement into the womb. That practice establishes inner communication in the way mother-baby without an interruption from external world. A flow of contradictory Information will not able to put pregnant woman to worry and panic condition;
2.    women in labor, it helps them to keep their mind under control during the labor pain, reminds them to keep doing their “work”. Holding the Shikyu-chan imitates for woman in labor her partner’s hand, what is really supportive in that hard time;
3.    women after delivery, it help to feel not lonely. During 10 months of pregnancy women was a center of people attention and support, then, after her baby was born, all o them sifted their sights to newborn infant and there are no one hold her hand and share kindness with. © The Self-relaxation Practice with Shikyu-chan simply can give her to feel physical touch and shrink lonely feeling.  
4.       woman who is going to or trying to get pregnant for while as an infertility treatment method. 
        Caregivers may suggest © The Self-relaxation Practice with Shikyu-chan for people in grief after lost their loved one, patient who suffer with pain and in termination stage. In all of these physical and mental conditions to feel someone’s “hand” in own palm is very supportive. 

How to practice
There is no any especial way to practice. Just softly squeeze the Shikyu-chan in your palm for 30 – 60 minutes. During this time try do not think about anything in particular.
Some people who practice the Self-relaxation with Shikyu-chan image themselves a womb what embraces and accepts of fragile embryo – Shikyu-chan.  

2011年6月7日火曜日

Evidence That Little Touches Do Mean So Much

 
Psychologists have long studied the grunts and winks of nonverbal communication, the vocal tones and facial expressions that carry emotion. A warm tone of voice, a hostile stare — both have the same meaning in Terre Haute or Timbuktu, and are among dozens of signals that form a universal human vocabulary.

But in recent years some researchers have begun to focus on a different, often more subtle kind of wordless communication: physical contact. Momentary touches, they say — whether an exuberant high five, a warm hand on the shoulder, or a creepy touch to the arm — can communicate an even wider range of emotion than gestures or expressions, and sometimes do so more quickly and accurately than words.

It is the first language we learn,” said Dacher Keltner, a professor of psychology at the University of California, Berkeley, and the author of “Born to Be Good: The Science of a Meaningful Life” (Norton, 2009), and remains, he said, “our richest means of emotional expression” throughout life.

The evidence that such messages can lead to clear, almost immediate changes in how people think and behave is accumulating fast. 

Students who received a supportive touch on the back or arm from a teacher were nearly twice as likely to volunteer in class as those who did not, studies have found

A sympathetic touch from a doctor leaves people with the impression that the visit lasted twice as long, compared with estimates from people who were untouched.  

Research by Tiffany Field of the Touch Research Institute in Miami has found that a massage from a loved one can not only ease pain but also soothe depression and strengthen a relationship.

In a series of experiments led by Matthew Hertenstein, a psychologist at DePauw University in Indiana, volunteers tried to communicate a list of emotions by touching a blindfolded stranger. The participants were able to communicate eight distinct emotions, from gratitude to disgust to love, some with about 70 percent accuracy.

“We used to think that touch only served to intensify communicated emotions,” Dr. Hertenstein said. Now it turns out to be “a much more differentiated signaling system than we had imagined.”

To see whether a rich vocabulary of supportive touch is in fact related to performance, scientists at Berkeley recently analyzed interactions in one of the most physically expressive arenas on earth: professional basketball. Michael W. Kraus led a research team that coded every bump, hug and high five in a single game played by each team in the National Basketball Association early last season.

In a paper due out this year in the journal Emotion, Mr. Kraus and his co-authors, Cassy Huang and Dr. Keltner, report that with a few exceptions, good teams tended to be touchier than bad ones. The most touch-bonded teams were the Boston Celtics and the Los Angeles Lakers, currently two of the league’s top teams; at the bottom were the mediocre Sacramento Kings and Charlotte Bobcats. 
The same was true, more or less, for players. The touchiest player was Kevin Garnett, the Celtics’ star big man, followed by star forwards Chris Bosh of the Toronto Raptors and Carlos Boozer of the Utah Jazz. “Within 600 milliseconds of shooting a free throw, Garnett has reached out and touched four guys,” Dr. Keltner said.To correct for the possibility that the better teams touch more often simply because they are winning, the researchers rated performance based not on points or victories but on a sophisticated measure of how efficiently players and teams managed the ball — their ratio of assists to giveaways, for example. And even after the high expectations surrounding the more talented teams were taken into account, the correlation persisted. Players who made contact with teammates most consistently and longest tended to rate highest on measures of performance, and the teams with those players seemed to get the most out of their talent.
The study fell short of showing that touch caused the better performance, Dr. Kraus acknowledged. “We still have to test this in a controlled lab environment,” he said.
If a high five or an equivalent can in fact enhance performance, on the field or in the office, that may be because it reduces stress. A warm touch seems to set off the release of oxytocin, a hormone that helps create a sensation of trust, and to reduce levels of the stress hormone cortisol

In the brain, prefrontal areas, which help regulate emotion, can relax, freeing them for another of their primary purposes: problem solving. In effect, the body interprets a supportive touch as “I’ll share the load.” 

“We think that humans build relationships precisely for this reason, to distribute problem solving across brains,” said James A. Coan, a a psychologist at the University of Virginia. “We are wired to literally share the processing load, and this is the signal we’re getting when we receive support through touch.”

The same is certainly true of partnerships, and especially the romantic kind, psychologists say. In a recent experiment, researchers led by Christopher Oveis of Harvard conducted five-minute interviews with 69 couples, prompting each pair to discuss difficult periods in their relationship.The investigators scored the frequency and length of touching that each couple, seated side by side, engaged in. In an interview, Dr. Oveis said that the results were preliminary.“But it looks so far like the couples who touch more are reporting more satisfaction in the relationship,” he said.
Again, it’s not clear which came first, the touching or the satisfaction. But in romantic relationships, one has been known to lead to the other. Or at least, so the anecdotal evidence suggests. 

2011年5月25日水曜日

The Project べびー福 / Baby-fuku : Donation of used baby's clothing.

We collect used baby's and kid's clothing in sizes from 0 till 3 years old, then provide direct delivery to mothers who live in devastated areas and developing countries.

Also we are truly appreciating small donations what covers a delivery cost and a new baby goods purchase.

 
A used baby clothing: some people will say: “It is just a trash”, some people think: “It is smart way to reuse it”, but for some of people it could very supportive.

Our babies have a magic feature: they grow up as yeast dough. Just couple months ago your baby was born and now you need to have a shopping, perhaps third times already.
How about those stuffs what have been used less than five times only?
Should its be sent to trash box?
We do not think so and there are several reasons, why:

First of all, if they still look like as new and in good quality it better to be reuse. Japanese language has very meaningful word: “mottainai”, what laterally “sad for waste of something”. In reality, to throw almost not used clothing out IS mottainai. We suggest: do not do like this.

Then, a family budget could be rescue by getting used baby clothing approach. To get a dozen new T-shirts and panties each month is really could crush a financial stability even a wealthy people.

The most important to understand, then at any time and any part of our world can happen difficulties, troubles or even a disaster, That can heard each individual and turn persons to change their life style and needs. Furthermore, for some of people daily surviving is their life style for many years. Many of these people are mothers. Each day in the motherhood they have to manage ways and sources to obtain food and clothes for their baby. To have some shirts, panties, hats and shoes as a gift could be supportive a lot.

To donate used clothing is absolutely not a bad manner, it is smart way to conserve resources and support people in their needs.

..............................................................................................................
『べびー福』は、0歳から3歳までの子供服を集め、発展途上国や災害地の子供たちへ届けるプロジェクトです。

人によっては「そんなの、ゴミ同然。そんなものを人にあげるなんて。」と思うかもしれません。
でも中には「子供服を使い回すのは、賢い活用法!!」と思う方もいるでしょう。

0歳から3歳までの子供たちは私たちが予測もつかない様なスピートで成長します。
特に最初の1ヶ月では、出生時の体重の1.5倍も大きくなるのです!!
お祝いでもらったおしゃれ着が、5回も袖を通さないうちに小さくなってしまった。。。なんてことも。
また、外出機会の少ない月齢では、洋服の痛みも少なく、靴などは新品同然の物もあるでしょう。

これらを着られなくなったからと言ってゴミ箱に捨ててしまうのはもったいない!!

子供の成長に合わせてサイズのあった洋服を着せることは、子供たちが自由に活発に動き回ることができます。
運動能力や精神的に発達していくためにも、とても大切な事です。
また、お母さんやお父さんも、子供に可愛い洋服を着せる楽しみは育児の疲れを癒す助けになるでしょう。

お金のかかる妊娠、出産、育児です。
しかし、必要不可欠な子供服にかかる費用を削減出来れば、食事や教育などに予算をあてられるでしょう。

古着を活用することは決してマナー違反ではありません。
『服』を賢く活用して、子供、お母さん、お父さんに『福』が届くことを願っています。

 

2011年5月20日金曜日

Midwifery Practice in Nepal

At present, midwifery is neither an independent profession in Nepal, nor exist a separate cadre of midwives. Maternal and child health workers (MCHW) with three-month basic training in the clinical settings after class 8 passed mainly focusing on maternal and child health, and Auxiliary Nurse-Midwives (ANM) with 18-months of programme after grade 10th are the only midwifery care provider in the community. These workforces have limited educational background, limited midwifery training and lack of logistics support from the health system.

There is no legislation and no recognition of midwives. However, the Government of Nepal has recognized the need of producing professional midwives in the country in improving Maternal and Newborn health. It is mentioned in the National Skilled Birth Attendants Policy Long term (Pre-service) Measures (GON 2006).

(MIDSON

2011年5月19日木曜日

Women’s Health Status and Services in Nepal


From 1996–2006, Maoist rebels fought a civil war against the Nepal government, a democracy with a House of Representatives. As a result, the overall health situation of the country is poorer than it should be. For instance, availability of essential health care services is 78.8% and life expectancy is 60 years. As in other developing countries, diseases of pregnant women and children, infections and malnutrition account for two-thirds of Nepal's illnesses.


Women in Nepal face discrimination and marginalisation in the family, society and state. This is because of the low status of women in the society. As a result, in a country where the health system is already poor, the level of women's health and education is particularly low. To compound the problem, many districts of Nepal are remote, making access to health services and information very limited.

Reproductive and maternal health is of particular concern among Nepali women. In Nepal, the key role of a woman is to bear children, particularly sons. In fact, early and excessive childbearing weakens women, many of whom die or are chronically disabled from complications of pregnancy. It is not uncommon for Nepali women to experience a prolapsed uterus following birth. This is often due to recommencing, too soon, the expected workload, which is demanding and strenuous. Often, the prolapse remains untreated and women continue their remaining reproductive life miserable due to pain and suffering.

Pregnancy is taken as a natural process and God's gift, for which any medical care is regarded as unnecessary. As a result, a majority of Nepalese women have been suffering from the aforementioned problems and complications related to childbirth. Because their overall health is poor, they have very little opportunity for exercising their reproductive and human rights. The majority of Nepalese women have no pregnancy-related contact with modern health services and maternity services in Nepal are very poor, underused and of poor quality.

According to the Nepal Demographic Health Survey (NDHS) 2006, 44% of women receive antenatal care from skilled birth attendants (SBAs), that is, a doctor or nurse-midwife; only 29% of pregnant women make antenatal care visits during their pregnancy; and less than 19% of births take place with the assistance of SBAs in a health facility, whereas 81% take place at home. Most of these homebirths are assisted by family members, neighbors, or traditional birth attendants who may be trained or untrained; or the woman may be on her own. A large proportion of maternal and neonatal deaths occur during the 24 hours following delivery. In addition, the first two days following delivery are critical for monitoring complications arising from the delivery. However, only one in five (20%) women receive postnatal care within four hours of delivery; slightly more than one in four (27%) receive care within the first 24 hours; and four percent are seen within one or two days following delivery. Each day in Nepal, 12 mothers and 75 babies die in childbirth.

The fact that 67% of maternal deaths take place at home and a further 11% on the way to hospital, coupled with the fact that 47% of deaths are due to postpartum haemorrhage, strengthens the case for skilled attendants both in the community and in accessible institutions (Pathak et al. 1998). Most of the mothers die of severe bleeding, a complication that can be treated even in basic health centers. The maternal mortality ratio (MMR), an indicator of the overall health of a population, stands at 281 deaths per 100,000 births in Nepal (NDHS, 2006). This is among the highest in the world. In comparison, the MMR is 90 in Sri Lanka and just eight per 100,000 in the US, according to the World Health Organization. Similarly, the perinatal mortality rate in Nepal is also one of the highest in the world (75 per 1000 live births). In Nepal, one woman dies every four hours from complications related to pregnancy and childbirth. The presence of a midwife could save many of them. Having a skilled professional at birth protects the life of the mother and the child by recognizing problems early, when the situation can still be controlled, and by intervening quickly.

In the 1990s, Nepal invested in two types of health workers to provide maternal/child health services and obstetric first aid at the village level: Maternal and Child Health Workers (MCHW) and Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANM). Neither category of worker has successfully functioned as a skilled birth attendant due to a number of factors. These include inadequate length of the midwifery component of the training; lack of competency-based training; lack of adequate clinical training and experience; professional and social isolation at post; and lack of support from the health system to enable MCHWs and ANMs to provide quality emergency obstetric and neonatal care, especially during life-threatening complications.

Since less than 19% of births take place with the assistance of an SBA, Nepal has a challenge in achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) to reduce child mortality and improve maternal health (MDG 4 and 5 respectively) by addressing factors related to various morbidities, death and disability caused by complications of pregnancy and childbirth. The targets for SBAs set for the country are: 40% of all births to be assisted by an SBA by 2005, 50% by 2010, and 60% by 2015. In order to achieve this target by 2015, a total of 4907 SBAs must be in post by 2012 (from 2395 at present) (GON 2007). This is an enormous challenge because currently, as per the internationally accepted definition, only a limited number of health workers in Nepal qualify as SBAs. Furthermore, unequal access to SBAs, depending on the area in which one lives and one’s economic status, is a barrier to achieving these MDG indicators. Fifty-one percent of deliveries in urban areas are attended by a SBA, compared to 14% of births in rural areas (NDHS 2006). Against such a backdrop is a need to produce skilled birth attendants who can proficiently deal with these national maternal and child health issues.

2011年5月3日火曜日

New clues to preventing miscarriage or pre-term births.


MISCARRIAGE and pre-term birth are the two things all parents-to-be worry about. Two studies published this week could help establish why some pregnancies go wrong, and offer hope for new treatments to prevent pregnancies ending this way.

One in five pregnancies end in miscarriage, and the risk increases with the age of the mother. Patricia Hunt and colleagues at Washington State University in Pullman have now identified a surprising contributing factor: a lack of quality control during egg-making.

Hunt's team found that not all of the immature egg cells, or oocytes, produced by mice contain the correct number of chromosomes. Egg or sperm cells divide through a process called meiosis, rather than the mitosis that is typical of cell division elsewhere in the body. There are several checks in place to make sure that meiosis occurs correctly, but Hunt's team found that this process isn't as strictly controlled in eggs as it is in sperm.

Specifically, when the pairs of chromosomes line up at what is called the meiotic spindle at the centre of the parent cell, they should await a chemical signal called the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) before dividing into daughter cells. However, the team found that eggs bend this rule. When they observed eggs dividing in ovaries removed from mice, they noticed that the SAC trigger for cell division waits for most - but not all - of the chromosomes to be lined up correctly. The consequence is either too many or too few chromosomes in the resulting egg cells, which can lead to birth defects or miscarriage (Current Biology, DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.003).

The cell division process "is highly conserved between mice and humans", says Hunt, suggesting that the same lack of quality control also applies to us. She reckons that we may be evolutionarily programmed to allow defective cells to divide because eggs are precious. "It is better to try and fail than to simply give up on an egg before it is even fertilised," she says.
As the absence of a control mechanism can only increase the risk of chromosomal abnormality, So Iha Nagaoka, co-author of the study, says that IVF could be adapted to include screening that sorts the bad eggs from the good in a way that the body does not, helping to reduce the risk of miscarriage.

Premature birth is also a distressing experience for parents, and it is this aspect of pregnancy that Justin Fay at Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Missouri, concentrates on. Some 12 per cent of babies are premature, and caring for them costs the UK £1 billion ($1.64 billion) a year.

Fay and colleagues think they have identified a contributing factor. "Humans have a shorter gestation period relative to their brain and body size than you would expect looking at other primate lineages," he says. This is a result of our large brains and the narrow female pelvis, which mean that in order to maximise the chance of both mother and baby surviving, our gestation period has had to shorten.

The researchers think that this shortening is encoded in the genes involved in birth timing, some of which must have evolved rapidly since we diverged from other apes, to keep up with the growth of our brains.

To find out, the team compared numerous genomes from humans and other primates and pinpointed around 150 likely candidates for genes involved in accelerated birth timing. When the researchers looked for these genes in 328 mothers in Finland they found that variations in a gene called FSHR were more frequent in mothers who gave birth before 37 weeks of gestation. The team says the gene could be a new target for therapeutic measures to prevent pre-term births (PLoS Genetics, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001365).

"It was surprising to find that FSHR was involved," says Fay. The hormone it controls- follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)- has a well-known function in the establishment of pregnancy rather than the initiation of labour. "It suggests that we should start looking at risk factors for pre-term births much earlier than 25 to 35 weeks into gestation," he says.

David Haig at Harvard University says that it may be significant that the neighbouring gene to FSHR - called LHCGR - is responsible for producing a hormone that helps to maintain a thick uterus during pregnancy. Any variations to FSHR might have a knock-on effect on nearby genes, he suggests.

Chimp births are surprisingly like our own

The process of human birth is unique among primates because the infant emerges with its head facing in the opposite direction from its mother, or so the argument goes. Now, the first close-up videos of three chimpanzee births suggest that theory is wrong. In all three cases, the newborn emerged with its head facing away from the mother (Biology Letters, DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0214).

It has also been suggested that the orientation of human newborns accounts for another uniquely human aspect of birth- the need for a midwife. Indeed, midwives contacted by New Scientist say that the differences in birth-related mortality rates between countries with good and poor levels of medical care shows the difference their assistance makes.

But this idea may also now be up for revision. Satoshi Hirata at the Great Ape Research Institute of Hayashibara Biochemical Laboratories in Okayama, Japan, who led the study, says that chimps make nests so that they have a safe place to give birth, which could allow this style of birth to occur without assistance.

2011年4月28日木曜日

Miscarriage: The loneliest grief of all.

Kate Evans has had six miscarriages. To her, each felt like a bereavement – yet she mourned in silence. So how do you deal with the loss of someone who never lived?

Tuesday, 27 January 2009

The doctor's silence tells me everything I need to know. Eventually, he clears his throat, and says in a voice deliberately gentled, "I'm very sorry". And so am I. There on the screen before us, I can make out the form of a tiny curled foetus and, where a few weeks earlier, its heart was thumping with life, it now lies still in the cavernous vacancy of my womb. This is no longer a baby. It is a miscarriage. 

It surprises me how surprised I am. This is the sixth baby we will have lost; you would think that I would be used to it by now. But maybe it's not surprising that I had to believe in this baby, as though by investing in it some hope, and some love, I could will it into being.
They have run all the tests. Like the majority of women with recurrent miscarriage, they have found nothing wrong with me. They don't know why this is happening. 

In my mother's generation, there were no early pregnancy tests, and you weren't officially pregnant until you had missed three periods. These days, it's different. The very first day of absent menstruation can find you racing to the chemist, and then fumbling with instructions and collection pots and testing sticks until that tell-tale blue line makes its announcement.
The next step is a visit to your GP, where you are told the day your baby is due. You are handed a free book on pregnancy containing photographs and descriptions of your developing baby. It confidently states that, by 12 weeks, the foetus is fully formed. (It doesn't warn you here that only five out of six pregnancies make it this far). The book suggests that you make an early appointment with your midwife and begin thinking about where you want your baby to be born. So you do. 

And you discover the unmistakable differences that pregnancy brings – the signs that women have never needed testing kits to tell them. A visit from the tit-fairy brings you newly enlarged and extra-sensitive bosoms. You have a vastly increased need for food and for sleep. You feel more squeamish, more nauseous, more emotional and more hygienic. The hormone rushes make you feel like you're stoned. Lack of food makes you violent. You feel the glow of life inside you. You begin to plan and to dream. You probably chat to your baby. You consider its sex and its name. 
And then you begin to bleed. 

So you've lost your baby. And it's such a massive thing to lose. You, me, everyone reading this, we all started out as a little smudge of amniotic cells. My children would be 18 months old, or four months old, or I would be five months pregnant. I've lost a good friend because her baby was born on the day that mine was due and I have never been to see him. It hurts too much. 

I have never known depression like the cloud that descends every time I lose a baby. I can compare it with the death of a close friend and I can honestly say that it's worse. When a friend of mine died suddenly, we viewed the body, we buried him and we were able to say goodbye. I had the company of others who were as grief-stricken as I was. My mind replayed moments with him – a ceaseless video stream of memories, which was part of the way that my brain processed the loss. 

With a miscarriage, I'm left battling through the layers of euphemism to even recognise that I have been bereaved. What is this that has happened? "Pregnancy loss"? The word "baby" was never mentioned by the staff in the Early Pregnancy Advisory Unit. When the scan revealed that my baby was no longer viable, I was referred for an operation with the horrendous name of "Evacuation of Retained Products of Conception". My child, described as clinical waste. 

If there's no body, how can I grieve? I feel as though I must be kidding myself, wallowing in a morass of grief over a person who never even lived. Every time my mind trips back to this death, this loss, it strikes on empty, because there's nothing there to miss. This jellybean, lying forlornly on some toilet tissue – how can that sum up all my hopes and dreams for this child? How can it contain all my love? 

I almost welcome the pain and blood that happens when I miscarry. It seems more real to me than opting for an operation under general anaesthetic. There is pain involved. I want to feel it. 

When a friend dies, you can seek solace in the company of other mourners. Miscarriage, by contrast is an entirely private grief. There's me and my partner, and he's generally so intent on protecting and comforting me that it's hard for him to make space for his emotions. "How are you?" a friend will ask, in a conversational tone, and I wonder, do they really want to know the blackness of my mood? Every time it happens, I find it harder to struggle through, and yet I fear that, for my friends, this drama has become repetitive and boring. With each miscarriage I need help more, yet I feel I can ask for it less. 

I am a mother. I have a child, conceived after my third miscarriage. In an earnest attempt at consolation, I am repeatedly told "Well, at least you have got him". And it's true, and I love my son dearly: he is perfect, wonderful and amazing. I am aware that the pain of other women who never carry a child must be greater than mine. But that doesn't mean that I'm not hurting. Having had a baby, I know exactly what it is I've lost. I know what it feels like to give birth, to breast-feed and to raise a child. The stack of baby clothes that I have in the attic is slowly diminishing, pragmatically distributed to women who are actually having babies, not ghosts. 

And alongside the helplessness and hopelessness there is another, even darker emotion. It could be politely described as bitterness. How it actually feels to me is hatred. I hate pregnant women. This is nuts. I have been heavily pregnant myself and I know it's no fun. What I should feel is sympathy. Envy would be understandable, but hatred? What's going on here?
There's generally no point trying to bury your emotions. It's only by feeling them and naming them that you can get through them. And if you try to run away from them, they have a habit of catching up with you. Jealousy and hatred are impolite, socially unacceptable emotions, but they could serve a purpose. Throughout the animal kingdom, there are examples of bereaved mothers attempting to steal babies. Maybe I'm just part of a bigger picture here. The survival of the species is best achieved if there is a mechanism for matching up thwarted parents with unwanted babies. And I have reached the point where I've thought, "She's got my baby. That's my baby that she's growing." Insanity, I know, but possibly evolutionarily useful insanity. 

So where does this leave me now? 

The stakes keep rising but we have to keep playing the game. Maybe another baby will arrive to heal the hole in my heart. Or maybe my life will continue, trapped into this loop, like a needle that lands on a record but hits a scratch and lifts off again before the song even starts playing. 

On a practical level, we don't seem to have much problem conceiving, which isn't entirely a blessing. I am sincerely grateful that we haven't spent thousands of pounds on IVF to walk this difficult road. But it does mean that any time we want to step off the roller-coaster, to gather our energies for the next ride, we have to avoid trying to conceive a baby that we desperately want. Which makes our lovemaking very poignant. The only fixed point that I can see ahead is the eventual end of my child-bearing years. Either we will have had another baby, or we will have tried. I won't be so sentimental as to say that these unborn babies will stay with me, because they never really lived, but these scars will have made me part of who I am. And I am proud of that. 

Our society conspires to render miscarriage invisible. There is an unwritten rule that a woman should never announce her pregnancy until she reaches three months "just in case". Just who is this helping? The first trimester is when a woman does the work of creating the baby. Every organ in the baby's body is formed, and the mother experiences worse fatigue and nausea than at any other point of gestation. Women need to be supported through this vulnerable period and, with no outward sign that they are pregnant, how are they going to access that help if they can't ask for it? 

And if they miscarry, as one in six early babies will, women need even more support through their trauma. "Not telling" leaves women stranded with their grief. How can they begin to explain that they are mourning the loss of something whose existence was kept secret in the first place? 

Pregnancy is a superstitious time and I can see why women don't want to tempt fate by announcing their news too soon. But fate has dealt me that blow, the one people don't talk about, and I can tell you that the fact that people don't talk about it makes it a whole lot worse. 

So talk. Tell. We can be proud of our pregnancies, no matter how "successful" they are. A hurting heart is a sign of a loving heart. The only thing that has really helped me through this is knowing other women who have been through the same thing. Miscarriage is such a common trauma – there is no reason for us to be alone in our grief. 

When it all goes wrong: The facts about pregnancy loss
 
* Miscarriage is common. Between one in five and one in eight pregnancies ends in miscarriage. Most miscarriages occur during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy.
* About half of miscarriages are thought to be due to the fact that the foetus is not developing normally because of chromosomal, genetic or other problems. The causes of the other half are not known.
* The risk of miscarriage increases with age, rising to about one in four pregnancies in women over 40.
* Following one miscarriage, a woman has the same chance of a subsequent pregnancy being successful as a woman who has not miscarried. Even after three miscarriages, there is a 70 per cent chance that the next pregnancy will be successful if no cause for the miscarriage has been identified.
* If a woman has three consecutive miscarriages, this is known as recurrent spontaneous miscarriage and doctors will want to investigate any possible causes. But often no cause can be found. 

The Stages of Grief After a Miscarriage.


When a woman experiences I miscarriage, she is subjected to the same stages of grief that is associated with the death of a loved one. While different psychologists agree and disagree on these stages of grief, there are many common elements that everyone will experience, including a woman who has had a miscarriage. I went through these stages.

I was ten weeks pregnant when I was told I was going to miscarry. I went straight into denial. This is always considered the first stage of grief. Some call it denial and others call it disbelief. Either way, a woman will not believe it is really happening. She will hold out hope until the miscarriage is over. I refused any intervention and waited for my miscarriage to happen naturally, because I was in denial. It took two weeks before my miscarriage. I held onto my hope the entire time.

Anger is another stage of grief. Not everyone believes that this is always going to occur. When a woman experiences a miscarriage, she gets angry. She gets angry with herself thinking about things she could have done better during her pregnancy. She gets angry with nobody in particular, because she wants to know why this happened to her and her baby!

Another stage of grief is plea-bargaining. Everyone has done it at some point. Asking for one thing and promising another in return. While this may not occur after a miscarriage, women who have been in the same position I was are likely to experience this. She will beg for the life of her baby in exchange for something else. I did this.

The stage of grief that most people are familiar with is the stage known as depression. This is when the reality of the situation truly sinks in. Every woman will experience this after a miscarriage. She will think of the child that "could have been."

Finally, there is acceptance. We cannot grieve forever. Life must continue. This will happen eventually. It is different for every woman and depends a lot on how far along she was when the miscarriage took place.
It is important to realize that every woman will experience the different stages of grief much differently. Some will skip a stage entirely. The length of each stage is never predictable. It is something a woman must
deal with before she is able to reach acceptance. It is vital that the people in her life allow for these stages of grief to occur. Too many people dismiss the feelings of a woman who has miscarried. They feel it is not comparable to losing a loved one.

It is comparable. While the child may have never breathed on his or her own, the mother will have already formed a bond. She will have considered names for her baby. She will have pictured what he or she would look like.
She probably even bought things for the baby. 

She developed a relationship and her grief is valid.
 

2011年4月27日水曜日

Heartfelt : giving the gift of photographic memories.

About the movie "Birth in Nepal".


The film maker, Sabina Shrestha has captured the scene very well. This a very common childbirth practices in rural Nepal, especially western part of Nepal. This flim is taken in the mid-western region of Nepal, where sociocultural taboos and practices are deeply entrenched in the society. 

Childbirths and menstruating blood are considered polluting and childbirths is considered normal life event thus not required medical help. In Nepal, women are considered second class citizen so having a girl child is considered burden to the family, which is some how reflected in the video.

Apart from this, in Nepal we don't have a separate cadre of midwife, who assisted women during childbirths. In the film, Laxmi was said midwife but in reality she is not a midwife. She is a Auxillary Nurse-midwife (ANM), who had undergone 18 months pre-service course to become a ANM. Just because of their long exposure and practices in rural setting health facilities they are able to assist women for normal childbirths. Otherwise, they are not competent and confident in assisting women for childbirth. Only ANMs are the one in rural and peripheral health care settings who are responsible for helping women before, during and after childbirths. They are based in the health facilities and in the village level there is no such health personnel who can help women during childbirth except female health community volunteer as mentioned in the video.

There is lots do in Nepal to save the lives of women and newborns. So, through our recently established Midwifery Society of Nepal we are advocating with the government of Nepal to strengthen maternity care services in rural areas by bringining a separate cadre of midwife as crucial human resource for safe motherhood, which has also been acknowledged by the government of Nepal and incorporated in the national policy but has not yet implemented. 

Here is the link of our society www.midson.org

Ms. Laxmi Tamang,
RN, MPH, Founder Managing Director, Aadharbhut Prasuti Sewa Kendra  (Nurse-midwives led Independent Birthing Centre), Kathmandu

2011年4月25日月曜日

Stillbirths: missing from the family and from family health/.

Gary L Darmstadt aEmail Address
Stillbirth is a devastating occurrence for families, and women bear the brunt of the consequences.1, 2 Hopes and dreams are dashed, and expectant women might suddenly face scorn, isolation, and rejection. They can be pressured to become pregnant again soon, and hence face a shortened birth interval and an increased risk for themselves and for subsequent pregnancies. This cycle continues—unbroken and unvoiced—every day in homes and communities around the world, especially in poor families.
The Lancet's Stillbirths Series is a landmark summation of the causes and global burden of stillbirths, along with a framework to deliver solutions within the context of reproductive, maternal and child health, and nutrition programmes, and a rallying cry for collective action. The Series builds on several recent reviews3—6 that have shaped the evidence base needed to address the problem.
This Series now authoritatively identifies stillbirth as one of the most shamefully neglected areas of public health. Although stillbirth is a universal problem, and exists along a spectrum of intrapartum stillbirths and intrapartum-related neonatal deaths (ie, birth asphyxia), the burden is woefully inequitable. Series authors J Frederik Frøen and colleagues1 point out that stillbirth rates in low-income countries are now where they were in high-income countries 50—100 years ago. They conclude that by simply addressing this inequity, bringing global stillbirth rates down to the average of low-burden settings, four in five stillbirths would be eliminated. The stillbirth burden, as enormous as it is with 2·6 million born dead after 28 weeks' gestation (an estimate from Simon Cousens and colleagues7 in another Series paper) is grossly underestimated. Such underestimation is due to under-reporting, inconsistent definitions, and the fact that stillbirths do not feature in major global or national health targets and commitments, in part because no global health constituency has taken full ownership of the problem.
This Series makes major strategic advances to show that the way to address the problem of stillbirth is to strengthen existing maternal, newborn, and child health programmes by focusing on a few key interventions, which also have benefits for mothers and neonates. If implemented, according to Zulfiqar Bhutta and co-workers8 in the Series, 15 proven antenatal and intrapartum interventions—ten of them also effective for averting stillbirths—could avert more than 2·7 million deaths of mothers and neonates, and stillbirths, each year by 2015. Tools are already available and a strong case has been made for their benefits for mothers and neonates;9—11 no new stillbirth-specific interventions, delivery platforms, or health-system elements are needed, a point made by Series authors Robert Pattinson and colleagues.12 What is needed, however, is a change in our framing of the continuum of care to include stillbirths.
The Stillbirths Series further emphasises the critical nature of the intrapartum period as a narrow window for intervention, when nearly half of stillbirths, three-quarters of maternal deaths, and one-quarter of newborn deaths occur (totalling 2·3 million deaths). If all we did was to provide good-quality care during childbirth, at a cost of less than US$1 per head, we could avert 1·4 million deaths of mothers and neonates, and stillbirths, each year. The stillbirths and newborn deaths that could be averted in addition to maternal deaths substantially strengthen the argument for childbirth care, which safe-motherhood advocates have been making for decades. In one of the more illuminating analyses in the Series, Pattinson and colleagues12 show that, if maternal deaths are only considered in deriving cost-effectiveness estimates of obstetric care, the figure of US$54 347 per death averted is not cost effective. When the stillbirths and neonatal deaths averted by these same interventions are also considered, the cost-effectiveness estimate improves dramatically to $3920 per death averted. Figures such as these show why advocates across all of women's and children's health should rally together to count and address stillbirth, and ensure integration of this issue into the continuum of care.
Antenatal care might play an important part in reducing the number of stillbirths in ways that current modelling does not take into account, for example, as a gateway behaviour associated with the uptake of other health-promoting behaviours. Family planning probably also has an important role, but its effect on stillbirth reduction was not modelled in this Series either. Selected nutritional interventions reduce stillbirths, but links between nutrition, infection, and susceptibility to hypoxic insults need further elucidation,13 as does the role of improved adolescent and maternal nutrition.
To improve women's and children's health, we need to optimise every interaction families have with the health system, particularly with frontline workers. Families should be empowered as producers of good health themselves, through the adoption of improved preventive and promotive practices, and care-seeking for complications. Simultaneously, frontline workers' capabilities, performance, and connections to the health system must be enhanced so they can provide more timely and effective counsel and care.14
Stillbirth is a major global public health problem and its day has come. New research is needed to improve our ability to prevent 60% of the stillbirth burden that cannot be averted with current interventions.8, 12 Meanwhile, inclusion of stillbirth when designing integrated family health programmes, and improving collection of stillbirth data, are important first steps to address this issue while also advancing the continuum of care.
Click to toggle image size
Full-size image (20K) David Scott Smith/Stock Connection/Rex Features
I declare that I have no conflicts of interest.

References

1 Frøen JF, Cacciatore J, McClure EM, et alfor The Lancet's Stillbirths Series steering committee. Stillbirths: why they matter. Lancet 201110.1016/S0140-6736(10)62232-5. published online April 14. PubMed
2 Haws RA, Mashasi I, Mrisho M, Schellenberg JA, Darmstadt GL, Winch PJ. “These are not good things for other people to know”: how women's understandings of pregnancy loss and early neonatal death in southern Tanzania may impact survey data quality. Soc Sci Med 2010; 71: 1764-1772. CrossRef | PubMed
3 Lawn JE, Kinney M, Lee ACC, et al. Reducing intrapartum-related deaths and disability: can the health system deliver?. Int J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 107: S123-S142. PubMed
4 Bhutta ZA, Darmstadt GL, Haws RA, Yakoob MY, Lawn JE. Delivering interventions to reduce the global burden of stillbirths: improving service supply and community demand. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009; 9 (suppl 1): S7. CrossRef | PubMed
5 Rubens CE, Gravett MG, Victora CG, Nunes TMthe GAPPS Review Group. Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (7 of 7): mobilizing resources to accelerate innovative solutions (Global Action Agenda). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010; 10 (suppl 1): S7. PubMed
6 Yakoob MY, Lawn JE, Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA. Stillbirths: epidemiology, evidence and priorities for action. Semin Perinatol 2010; 34: 387-394. CrossRef | PubMed
7 Cousens S, Stanton C, Blencowe H, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2009 with trends since 1995: a systematic analysis. Lancet 201110.1016/S0140-6736(10)62310-0. published online April 14. PubMed
8 Bhutta ZA, Yakoob MY, Lawn JE, et alfor The Lancet's Stillbirths Series steering committee. Stillbirths: what difference can we make and at what cost?. Lancet 201110.1016/S0140-6736(10)62050-8. published online April 14. PubMed
9 Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA, Cousens S, Adam T, Walker N, de Bernis Lfor the Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team. Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save?. Lancet 2005; 365: 977-988. Summary | Full Text | PDF(147KB) | CrossRef | PubMed
10 Bhutta ZA, Ali S, Cousens S, et al. Interventions to address maternal, newborn, and child survival: what difference can integrated primary health care strategies make?. Lancet 2008; 372: 972-989. Summary | Full Text | PDF(340KB) | CrossRef | PubMed
11 Campbell OMR, Graham WJon behalf of The Lancet Maternal Survival Series steering group. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet 2006; 368: 1284-1299. Summary | Full Text | PDF(296KB) | CrossRef | PubMed
12 Pattinson R, Kerber K, Buchmann E, et alfor The Lancet's Stillbirths Series steering committee. Stillbirths: how can health systems deliver for mothers and babies?. Lancet 201110.1016/S0140-6736(10)62306-9. published online April 14. PubMed
13 Lee AC, Mullany LC, Tielsch JM, et al. Risk factors for birth asphyxia mortality in a community-based setting in Southern Nepal. Pediatrics 2008; 121: e1381-e1390. CrossRef | PubMed
14 Kumar V, Kumar A, Darmstadt GL. Behavior change for newborn survival in resource-poor community settings: bridging the gap between evidence and impact. Semin Perinatol 2010; 34: 446-461. CrossRef | PubMed