Powered By Blogger
ラベル medicine and culture aspects の投稿を表示しています。 すべての投稿を表示
ラベル medicine and culture aspects の投稿を表示しています。 すべての投稿を表示

2011年5月20日金曜日

Midwifery Practice in Nepal

At present, midwifery is neither an independent profession in Nepal, nor exist a separate cadre of midwives. Maternal and child health workers (MCHW) with three-month basic training in the clinical settings after class 8 passed mainly focusing on maternal and child health, and Auxiliary Nurse-Midwives (ANM) with 18-months of programme after grade 10th are the only midwifery care provider in the community. These workforces have limited educational background, limited midwifery training and lack of logistics support from the health system.

There is no legislation and no recognition of midwives. However, the Government of Nepal has recognized the need of producing professional midwives in the country in improving Maternal and Newborn health. It is mentioned in the National Skilled Birth Attendants Policy Long term (Pre-service) Measures (GON 2006).

(MIDSON

2011年5月19日木曜日

Women’s Health Status and Services in Nepal


From 1996–2006, Maoist rebels fought a civil war against the Nepal government, a democracy with a House of Representatives. As a result, the overall health situation of the country is poorer than it should be. For instance, availability of essential health care services is 78.8% and life expectancy is 60 years. As in other developing countries, diseases of pregnant women and children, infections and malnutrition account for two-thirds of Nepal's illnesses.


Women in Nepal face discrimination and marginalisation in the family, society and state. This is because of the low status of women in the society. As a result, in a country where the health system is already poor, the level of women's health and education is particularly low. To compound the problem, many districts of Nepal are remote, making access to health services and information very limited.

Reproductive and maternal health is of particular concern among Nepali women. In Nepal, the key role of a woman is to bear children, particularly sons. In fact, early and excessive childbearing weakens women, many of whom die or are chronically disabled from complications of pregnancy. It is not uncommon for Nepali women to experience a prolapsed uterus following birth. This is often due to recommencing, too soon, the expected workload, which is demanding and strenuous. Often, the prolapse remains untreated and women continue their remaining reproductive life miserable due to pain and suffering.

Pregnancy is taken as a natural process and God's gift, for which any medical care is regarded as unnecessary. As a result, a majority of Nepalese women have been suffering from the aforementioned problems and complications related to childbirth. Because their overall health is poor, they have very little opportunity for exercising their reproductive and human rights. The majority of Nepalese women have no pregnancy-related contact with modern health services and maternity services in Nepal are very poor, underused and of poor quality.

According to the Nepal Demographic Health Survey (NDHS) 2006, 44% of women receive antenatal care from skilled birth attendants (SBAs), that is, a doctor or nurse-midwife; only 29% of pregnant women make antenatal care visits during their pregnancy; and less than 19% of births take place with the assistance of SBAs in a health facility, whereas 81% take place at home. Most of these homebirths are assisted by family members, neighbors, or traditional birth attendants who may be trained or untrained; or the woman may be on her own. A large proportion of maternal and neonatal deaths occur during the 24 hours following delivery. In addition, the first two days following delivery are critical for monitoring complications arising from the delivery. However, only one in five (20%) women receive postnatal care within four hours of delivery; slightly more than one in four (27%) receive care within the first 24 hours; and four percent are seen within one or two days following delivery. Each day in Nepal, 12 mothers and 75 babies die in childbirth.

The fact that 67% of maternal deaths take place at home and a further 11% on the way to hospital, coupled with the fact that 47% of deaths are due to postpartum haemorrhage, strengthens the case for skilled attendants both in the community and in accessible institutions (Pathak et al. 1998). Most of the mothers die of severe bleeding, a complication that can be treated even in basic health centers. The maternal mortality ratio (MMR), an indicator of the overall health of a population, stands at 281 deaths per 100,000 births in Nepal (NDHS, 2006). This is among the highest in the world. In comparison, the MMR is 90 in Sri Lanka and just eight per 100,000 in the US, according to the World Health Organization. Similarly, the perinatal mortality rate in Nepal is also one of the highest in the world (75 per 1000 live births). In Nepal, one woman dies every four hours from complications related to pregnancy and childbirth. The presence of a midwife could save many of them. Having a skilled professional at birth protects the life of the mother and the child by recognizing problems early, when the situation can still be controlled, and by intervening quickly.

In the 1990s, Nepal invested in two types of health workers to provide maternal/child health services and obstetric first aid at the village level: Maternal and Child Health Workers (MCHW) and Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANM). Neither category of worker has successfully functioned as a skilled birth attendant due to a number of factors. These include inadequate length of the midwifery component of the training; lack of competency-based training; lack of adequate clinical training and experience; professional and social isolation at post; and lack of support from the health system to enable MCHWs and ANMs to provide quality emergency obstetric and neonatal care, especially during life-threatening complications.

Since less than 19% of births take place with the assistance of an SBA, Nepal has a challenge in achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) to reduce child mortality and improve maternal health (MDG 4 and 5 respectively) by addressing factors related to various morbidities, death and disability caused by complications of pregnancy and childbirth. The targets for SBAs set for the country are: 40% of all births to be assisted by an SBA by 2005, 50% by 2010, and 60% by 2015. In order to achieve this target by 2015, a total of 4907 SBAs must be in post by 2012 (from 2395 at present) (GON 2007). This is an enormous challenge because currently, as per the internationally accepted definition, only a limited number of health workers in Nepal qualify as SBAs. Furthermore, unequal access to SBAs, depending on the area in which one lives and one’s economic status, is a barrier to achieving these MDG indicators. Fifty-one percent of deliveries in urban areas are attended by a SBA, compared to 14% of births in rural areas (NDHS 2006). Against such a backdrop is a need to produce skilled birth attendants who can proficiently deal with these national maternal and child health issues.

2011年4月27日水曜日

About the movie "Birth in Nepal".


The film maker, Sabina Shrestha has captured the scene very well. This a very common childbirth practices in rural Nepal, especially western part of Nepal. This flim is taken in the mid-western region of Nepal, where sociocultural taboos and practices are deeply entrenched in the society. 

Childbirths and menstruating blood are considered polluting and childbirths is considered normal life event thus not required medical help. In Nepal, women are considered second class citizen so having a girl child is considered burden to the family, which is some how reflected in the video.

Apart from this, in Nepal we don't have a separate cadre of midwife, who assisted women during childbirths. In the film, Laxmi was said midwife but in reality she is not a midwife. She is a Auxillary Nurse-midwife (ANM), who had undergone 18 months pre-service course to become a ANM. Just because of their long exposure and practices in rural setting health facilities they are able to assist women for normal childbirths. Otherwise, they are not competent and confident in assisting women for childbirth. Only ANMs are the one in rural and peripheral health care settings who are responsible for helping women before, during and after childbirths. They are based in the health facilities and in the village level there is no such health personnel who can help women during childbirth except female health community volunteer as mentioned in the video.

There is lots do in Nepal to save the lives of women and newborns. So, through our recently established Midwifery Society of Nepal we are advocating with the government of Nepal to strengthen maternity care services in rural areas by bringining a separate cadre of midwife as crucial human resource for safe motherhood, which has also been acknowledged by the government of Nepal and incorporated in the national policy but has not yet implemented. 

Here is the link of our society www.midson.org

Ms. Laxmi Tamang,
RN, MPH, Founder Managing Director, Aadharbhut Prasuti Sewa Kendra  (Nurse-midwives led Independent Birthing Centre), Kathmandu

2011年4月24日日曜日

Stillbirths: the professional organisations' perspective

The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), the International Paediatric Association (IPA), and the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) are well aware of the often forgotten issue of stillbirth, and recognise it as one of the most common adverse pregnancy outcomes worldwide—with about 2·6 million or more stillbirths happening every year.1 The explanation for many of these deaths is straightforward and terrible: all too often a trained health worker is not available when an expectant mother or woman in labour faces a situation endangering her baby's life. When confronted with a stillbirth, obstetricians, midwives, and paediatricians have to contend not only with the loss of life, but also the distress of parents and disappointment of family at a time that should be joyous and about bringing a new life into the world. Furthermore, the outcome of the next pregnancy is often a major concern for parents, because a previous stillbirth is, depending on the population, associated with a two-fold to four-fold increased risk2—4 of recurrence compared with women who have had a previous livebirth. Additionally, risk of pregnancy and birth complications in the subsequent pregnancy is heightened.5
Maternal and fetal outcomes at birth are a sensitive indicator of the status of health systems. They show the quality of care that is available to manage maternal and fetal life-threatening complications, which are often unpredictable and need a rapid, skilled response and access to tertiary emergency obstetric services, including well coordinated teamwork between obstetricians, midwives, and paediatricians. Access to such services in 33 of 51 Countdown countries is poor, resulting in rural coverage rates for caesarean section below 5%, which are indicative of challenges to human resources and other health systems. Four countries, Burkina Faso, Chad, Ethiopia, and Niger, have rural rates below 1%.6 Only 15 Countdown countries meet the crucial threshold of 23 doctors, nurses, and midwives per 10 000 people. These numbers are estimated to be necessary to ensure that 80% of all births have assistance from a skilled attendant to deliver essential health services.7 This shortage is compounded by uneven geographical distribution of these health-care workers within countries.8
FIGO's mission to improve women's health, rights, and access to reproductive and sexual health services, and reduce disparities in health care for women and newborn babies places prevention and management of stillbirth in the centre of its interest and activities.9 The ultimate goal of obstetricians, midwives, and paediatricians is that every pregnancy is wanted, every birth safe, every newborn baby healthy, and every woman, including adolescents, treated with dignity and respect. In cases of stillbirth, obstetricians, midwives, and paediatricians face the psychological and emotional issues arising for women, their partners, and families. Unfortunately, many of these women and couples do not receive comprehensive counselling about the reasons behind the stillbirth, the potential for it to recur, and how to prevent it in a subsequent pregnancy. Because a definitive cause cannot be identified in about half of cases,2 stillbirth baffles obstetricians, midwives, neonatologists, and paediatricians, making counselling very difficult, even in developed countries where advances in socioeconomic standards and high-quality antenatal and intrapartum care have contributed to reduced rates.
Obstetricians, midwives, and paediatricians should be pleased that The Lancet has published a Series on this important health issue. We believe that FIGO, IPA, and ICM have a major part to play in saving the lives of millions of stillborn babies worldwide, especially in developing countries. We must also address the distress of millions of couples who are affected. At the microlevel, obstetricians, midwives, and paediatricians can contribute to important measures such as advocacy, health education, high-quality health-care services during pregnancy and childbirth, including addressing the leading causes of stillbirths, and access to emergency obstetric care when needed. We must also work together to provide proper informative and supportive counselling of parents of a stillborn baby. At the macrolevel, these three organisations can make a difference through advocacy, partnership with UN and other organisations, training and education, capacity building of member associations to provide high-quality maternal and neonatology care, and task shifting when specialists are in short supply.10
Click to toggle image size
Full-size image (77K) Science Photo Library
GIS is the President of FIGO, SAC is the President of IPA, and BL is the President of ICM.

References

1 Cousens S, Stanton C, Blencowe H, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2009 with trends since 1995: a systematic analysis. Lancet 201110.1016/S0140-6736(10)62310-0. published online April 14. PubMed
2 Herring A, Reddy U. Recurrence risk of stillbirth in the second pregnancy. BJOG 2010; 117: 1173-1174. CrossRef | PubMed
3 Sharma PP, Salihu HM, Kirby RS. Stillbirth recurrence in a population of relatively low risk mothers. Paediatric Perinat Epidemiol 2007; 21 (supp 1): 24-30. PubMed
4 Bhattacharya S, Prescott G, Black M, Shelty A. Recurrence risk of stillbirth in a second pregnancy. BJOG 2010; 117: 1234-1247. PubMed
5 Black M, Sheltie A, Bhattacharya S. Obstetric outcomes subsequent to intrauterine death in the first pregnancy. BJOG 2008; 115: 269-274. CrossRef | PubMed
6 WHO, UNICEF. Countdown to 2015: decade report (2000—2010). Taking stock of maternal, newborn and child survival. http://www.countdown2015mnch.org/documents/2010report/CountdownReportOnly.pdf. (accessed Jan 16, 2011).
7 WHO. Working together for health: the world health report 2006. http://www.who.int/whr/2006/whr06_en.pdf. (accessed Jan 16, 2011).
8 WHO. Global health atlas. http://apps.who.int/globalatlas/default.asp. (accessed Jan 16, 2011).
9 Serour GI. A vision for FIGO 2009—2012. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010; 108: 93-96. CrossRef | PubMed
10 Serour GI. Brain drain. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009; 106: 175-178. CrossRef | PubMed
a International Islamic Centre For Population Studies and Research, Al Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
b International Pediatric Association, Estacio de Sa University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
c Canadian Association of Midwives, Montréal, Québec, Canada
 

2011年4月1日金曜日

Medical staff and bereavement parents. The story.


"...She was 28 years old, and pregnant of discordant twins.
In 32 weeks of gestation we diagnosed that the small twin as IUGR (intra-uterine growth restriction), but the other twin fine.

After I explained twins status to the parents, I showed the decision to end this pregnancy by Cesarean for rescuing the small twin in34 weeks. Because it was only 32 weeks, we had decided to prolong 2 more weeks for fetal maturation. Also I was obligated to have a business trip for 1 week (during 33rd weeks of her pregnancy), so it was an additional reason to delay the Cesarean.  

Unfortunately, early morning on just 33 weeks of gestation, I got the phone call from hospital with bad news: the small twin had suddenly died. It happened exactly one day before my business trip…I was really shocked.
I apologized for the fact that I could not predict with the mother, father and other relative:  My
business trip seemed to them the main reason to delay the Cesarean and, logically, the main reason of one twin’s death. They believed if the Cesarean was done in 32 weeks both of twins baby could have been saved.   

I was worried if I could make the right decision at that time. I evaluated survived twin’s health and I proposed we could wait till 34 weeks from medical point. If it was possible to wait, I did not want to detach the dead baby soon from mother.  but… she was having the dead baby inside and I was obligated to be of city by business. Though, over this discussion we took the risk to wait until 34th weeks for be sure about safe of the alive fetus better.
Furthermore, she stopped to talk.

From that time on, the hospital staff has been keeping to exam regularly the heart beating of only survived twin, then happened unfortunate accident; one of doctor who was not familiar with the situation make an effort to exam the second fetus’s heart beating. It has unpredictable effect; she felt revive and start to communicate. She realize that she is caring on still two her babies inside even on of them is not alive any more.
In contrary to the mother, this accident had made the father very mad. From this moment they went by the different roads.

One week later I was back to the hospital. Surprisingly, spontaneous delivery has begun the day. I felt as if both baby would have waited for me to come back. First came out the healthy baby-boy who had been immediately place in an infant incubator to pediatrician sector. He was fine.

Then it was the time to come out of the dead baby. In the delivery room, there were mother in labor, nurse and me only. It was proper company of people who wanted to meet this baby and share own sad feeling. The mother had enough time with dead baby to hold, to cry and to say goodbye.

The father was keeping his anger and avoided spending time with dead baby. By this reason we had a lot of time to communicate with the bereavement mother.

This kind and supportive treat helped to the mother passed relatively smooth the anger stage of her grief via mostly asking a questions and taking about the event.

But the father escaped to talk in a normal way with us, did not visit the hospital during the mother was staying there and, did not emotionally support her. They lost communication way, so about two year after got divorce. …”

Dr. Masato Takeuchi, MD, PhD, 
Tokyo Humanized Care Center